Termination clause not valid because employee quit during probationary period: CourtWorker claimed employer didn't live up to contract by giving him a raise after positive performance review07/30/2008|Canadian Employment Law Today A Ramada employee isn’t entitled to receive termination pay because he quit before the end of his probationary period, the British Columbia Provincial Court has ruled. Jason Johnson was hired by the Ramada Plaza and Conference Centre in Abbotsford, B.C., to be the facility’s banquet manager on Aug. 27, 2007. His contract set out a six-month probation period, at the end of which he would receive a performance review. If his review was satisfactory, his salary would increase. The contract allowed Johnson to terminate the contract by giving four weeks’ notice. Johnson received a performance evaluation on Jan. 31, 2008, that rated him “above standard.” However, on Feb. 19, eight days before his probation ended, Johnson gave written notice he was terminating his employment as of March 31. He said it was because he had received a good performance review but Ramada hadn’t increased his salary. The next day, Ramada terminated him, saying he was still a probationary employee and it had the right to terminate him without notice. Ramada said after Johnson’s notice of resignation, it had no faith in his commitment to his job and the contract didn’t specify the salary increase would come immediately after the performance review. To Read the Full Story, Subscribe or Sign In Remember Me Forgot Password If you are a current Subscriber, please click here to set-up or update your login information.