No ambiguity when contract provides more than statutory minimum

Dismissed worker argued termination provision wasn’t clear on exact severance entitlement, but it gave worker more than legal minimum

A British Columbia company’s termination provision wasn’t ambiguous because it stated statutory minimums were the floor for severance payments and provided for a greater entitlement than the minimums anyway, the B.C. Supreme Court has ruled.

To read the full story, login below.

Not a subscriber?

Start your subscription today!